Skip to main content
Penn History

A Timeline of Diversity at the University of Pennsylvania

This chronological overview of the integration of women, ethnic Americans and International students at Penn was compiled and edited by Michael Franklin (College, 2008) under the supervision of Mark Frazier Lloyd, August 2007.

1740-1915: Pioneers at Penn

Men's 1600 meter relay team, 1908 Olympic Games, including Penn's Nathaniel J. Cartmell (W'08 - #21) and John B. Taylor (V'08 - #23)

“I think that what diversity means today is also meaningful for the whole history of racism and sexism and classism in this country. And that is, it means breaking down the barriers to opportunity and to a really excellent education, and to really open leadership in our society- and those barriers have been many. And a commitment to diversity, to me, means a commitment to struggling against those barriers.”

President Amy Gutmann, “Towards Inclusion”

1916-1966: Minorities Appear Across Campus

American Indian Club, American Indian Nite, 1928

“We have an enrollment at the University of 12,000 students, who have registered from every State in the Union, and 253 students from at least fifty foreign countries and foreign territories, including India, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia and practically all the British possessions except Ireland; every Latin American country, and most of the Oriental and European nations.”

George E. Nitzsche

1967-1989: From Presence to Permanence

"Minority students at Penn," brochure cover, 1989

“[The committee] does subscribe to the notion that a major part of the total educational experience of a university student is found in the interchange of ideas with other students and the mingling of cultures represented within the student body. Thus, it believes that diversity of student background is a positive educational value and should be actively pursued, even at the expense of other desirable attributes. The admission policy of the University should be designed to produce a student population having the highest possible diversification as to (1) intellectual interests, (2) special talents, (3) social and economic background, and (4) cultural characteristics. The social, economic, and cultural homogeneity of the present student body is a source of some concern to the Committee, and some of the subsequent recommendations of this Report reflect this concern.”

“Admissions Policy for the Undergraduate Schools of the University of Pennsylvania,”
Chaired by Dan M. McGill,

1990-2007: Towards Inclusion

Ivy Day honor men, 1996

“There is a big difference between diversity and inclusion. Diversity is sort of- it’s just a snapshot. I say that there can be no case for diversity because the case is already made, it is the- it is the reality in which we live. What doesn’t exist and what takes hard work and what you have to think about is inclusion. So just simply having, you know, the existence of different groups and a multiplicity of cultures isn’t enough. And so really it is inclusion, real efforts that you make affirmatively, to include people of different backgrounds and sort of accentuating those differences. And what that means is that ultimately as you as an institution will change, and will have to change. That’s not a bad thing.”

Gilbert F. Casellas, Esq., “Towards Inclusion”